Litigation. Compliance. Defense. Health Care Fraud & Criminal Defense Trial Lawyers
Orange County 714-294-2000
Los Angeles 310-873-8140
Detroit 313-462-7972
Nationwide 214-469-9009

How Synthetic Drug Possession Is Handled in Federal Court

Schedule a Free Consultation Today

In 1986, Congress enacted the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act (CSAEA) in order to combat the sale and use of synthetic drugs (also referred to as “analogues”) that mimic the effects of illegal controlled substances. If you are facing trafficking or distribution charges under the CSAEA, you could be looking at years in federal prison and potentially millions of dollars in fines. To protect yourself as much as possible, you need to hire an experienced federal drug crimes attorney right away.

Synthetic Drugs are Treated as Schedule I Controlled Substances Under the CSAEA

The key to the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act is Section 813, which states:

“A controlled substance analogue shall, to the extent intended for human consumption, be treated, for the purposes of any Federal law as a controlled substance in schedule I.”

As a result, if you are found guilty of trafficking in bath salts, K2, or any other synthetic drug, you are facing the same criminal penalties as someone convicted of trafficking heroin or LSD. For individuals, this includes a prison sentence of five to 20 years for a first offense, and up to a $5 million fine. For a second offense, you could be facing life imprisonment and an $8 million fine.

Even for lesser offenses – such possession with intent to distribute –a conviction can result in long-term imprisonment.

The “Knowledge” Requirement of the CSAEA

The CSAEA faced a Constitutional challenge earlier this year, but the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law based in part on its requirement that the accused have “knowledge” that he or she is dealing with a controlled substance under federal law. Specifically, Section 841(a)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act states that it is “unlawful for any person knowingly . . . to distribute . . . a controlled substance,” and the Supreme Court held that this “knowledge” requirement extends to distribution of analogue substances under the CSAEA.

However, the Supreme Court also held that the CSAEA’s “knowledge” requirement can be satisfied in one of two ways:

  • “[B]y evidence that a defendant knew that the substance he was distributing is controlled under the CSA or Analogue Act, regardless of whether he knew the substance’s identity;” or,
  • “[B]y evidence that the defendant knew the specific analogue he was distributing, even if he did not know its legal status as a controlled substance analogue.”

This makes CSAEA cases extremely complex, and those facing federal charges for trafficking or distributing synthetic drugs are at a significant disadvantage without experienced legal representation. Defending synthetic drug charges requires significant legal and technical knowledge, and may even call for expert chemical testimony.

Oberheiden, P.C. | Federal Drug Crime Defense Lawyers

At Oberheiden, P.C., we provide experienced and aggressive legal representation for federal synthetic drug crimes. Our attorneys have decades of experience and have successfully represented clients across the country. We are prepared to win, whatever it takes. To schedule a complimentary case evaluation, please contact us today.

Orange County 714-294-2000
Los Angeles 310-873-8140
Detroit 313-888-8807
Nationwide 888-452-2503